Monday, 19 November 2012

Ladies Room: The Real Mad Men

As a member of the AdSoc Society at Bucks New Uni I have the opportunity to attend events at the University and hopefully some on location that deal with Advertising as an industry in various formats. 

The most recent event was having Andrew Cracknell author of 'The Real Mad Men: The Remarkable True Story of Madison Avenue's Golden Age come in and share his first hand knowledge of the industry in the infamous 'MadMen' era the 1960's, as well as highlighting key changing moments that occurred during that time.
Andrew Cracknell, Vic Davies, Jessica Wharton, Ian Adams, Hannah Meyer (me)
A common theme that was present during Andrew's talk is that time repeats itself. Many of the issues present in the book that occurred during the 1960's are happening again.

This struck me as shocking, why would that play into an advertising campaign? Surely the point was to send a message from the brand to the consumer, Andrew explained that during this revolutionary era of the industry ads were talking at consumers about brands. This was successful because not everyone had a dish washer, or microwave. Consumers were new to a lot of brands and their products. However, once everyone had such items including the flashy car how were brands going to be successful? 

Andrew described this realisation as talking to consumers about brands. By involving them in the process, by  being persuasive, providing simplicity, and showing the humanity of the brand. It's true and this creative uplift in the industry produced some of the most memorable advertisements, outline in 'The Real Madmen' book.
Even being as obvious as underlining the objectives of the ad, telling the consumer what they want and need.
When DDB came out with an award winning ad, stepping away from telling the consumer. But welcoming the idea of communication, that 'yes this is an ugly, small car we are not hiding anything'.

It was these ads that encouraged the growth of the American culture, by bringing a human element of honesty to the creative process of advertising. Stepping away from hand drawn pictures depicting the 'ideal' family and welcoming the honesty and personality of brands.

But how has this repeated in the 21st century. In my opinion, the introduction of digital has mirrored this. Ads use to tell you want you wanted to hear. However, the more and more digitally inclined brands become there also is less and less room for this and all the fancy copy to make the product even better then it is.

Brands need to be honest again, trust the consumer and trust themselves.

Friday, 12 October 2012

Smoke gets in your eyes


The first post is always the hardest, where do I being? First I should point out that my name is in fact not Peggy, when coming up with a name for my advertising based blog I did the typical thing and based the name off one of my favourite TV programs, Mad Men. You might also notice that the post titles correspond in chronological order of each episode. Clever eh? Oh ya, and I'm Canadian.

Now, since this is technically an academic piece of work, and something I hope to carry on after I graduate (next September!) I figured that an introduction to my dissertation idea is a good place to start.

I have become what some people would call a 'nerd' the past few years, apparently I already was one in hiding. People often question me when I say I don't watch TV. It's not really that I don't watch any programs, I watch TV show's quite a few actually just not on a TV immediately as they are aired. I mainly watch programs on YouTube, some of which are news related and some of which are comical skits or daily vlogs. I also will watch catch-up TV on BBC iPlayer, 4oD, I even had a Netflix subscription for a few months. I just haven't felt the need for a TV in my life. Not when I have more programs available at my fingertip online then I ever would from a TV.

What really interests me is that while I watch these programs on my laptop, sometimes even my iPad how are advertisers benefitting from my multi-platform/second screen activities, or even yet how is it negatively affecting their campaigns? How is what I am doing with my technological behaviour, and what thousands of other 'viewers' are doing while they watch a TV program affecting the ads presented to us. Does it make us less attentive because we are 'multi-tasking' or more inclined to make an immediate response to the ad?